网站标志
导航菜单
当前日期时间
当前时间:
购物车
购物车中有 0 件商品 去结算 我的订单
商品搜索
商品搜索:
点评详情
发布于:2019-10-10 05:36:19  访问:190 次 回复:0 篇
版主管理 | 推荐 | 删除 | 删除并扣分
Lahren Rejects Hillary Clinton`s Latest Excuse For Losing In 2019: `It Was Your Lying`
Tomi Lahren had a blunt message for former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, who recently went on national television and put forward a new explanation for why she lost the 2016 election. \"We didn’t trust you, we don’t trust you, we never will trust you! So please, for the sake of your sanity and ours, just go away! On Wednesday, Clinton appeared on ABC’s ‘The View’ and offered this commentary on her 2016 loss to Donald Trump. Oh, and your lying! To see Lahren`s full remarks and for more episodes of Tomi Lahren`s daily commentary offering a refreshing and unfiltered perspective on issues across the country, join Fox Nation and watch \"Final Thoughts\" today. Fox Nation programs are viewable on-demand and from your mobile device app, but available only for Fox Nation subscribers. Go to Fox Nation to start a free trial and watch the extensive library from Tomi Lahren, Pete Hegseth, Abby Hornacek, Laura Ingraham, Greg Gutfeld, Judge Andrew Napolitano and many more of your favorite Fox News personalities.
It has been said that there are only two cures for those bitten by the presidential bug: election or death. The most famous loser of a presidential campaign is peddling another book, so each day interviewers ask her vapid questions about how she feels. Naturally, she responds with vapid variations on a theme: Donald Trump is no good, he stole the election, the world is ending, I’m fine, thank you. Only she’s not fine, or she wouldn’t continue to embarrass herself by trying to rewrite history. She lost the election fair and square and even the \"resistance\" movement no longer pretends otherwise. A brief detour down memory lane reveals the hypocrisy. When Trump said in the third presidential debate of 2016 that he might not accept the election results, Clinton pounced on what she believed was a disqualifying mistake. \"That’s horrifying,\" she replied. \"Let’s be clear about what he is saying and what that means. He is denigrating — he is talking down our democracy. Here we are, and she’s the one still contesting the results and \"talking down our democracy.\" Now that’s horrifying.
Her refusal to accept Trump’s election can mean only one thing: In her own mind, she won the election and she’s the real president. In that case, we have another problem with only two options. She can see a shrink, or prove she’s right. I long thought Clinton wanted a rematch with Trump and assumed she was keeping her options open. She started a slush fund and tried to assume a leading voice of opposition during the 2018 midterms. But early this year, as the 2020 field took shape and https://www.metafilter.com/47404/Trust-Cancels-Fear she didn’t make a move, I began to wonder. He dismissed as ­\"media catnip\" reports that she might try again and said flatly: \"I take her at her word. Ah, but there’s no point in being a Clinton if you can’t say one thing and do another. It would be amusing — and instructive — to see her test the claim that Trump is illegitimate. It could be her motto, certainly more interesting than the insipid \"I’m with her\" tag line she tried last time.
Imagine the reaction of the Dem candidates who have been appearing in forums and debates and scarfing down fried Twinkies and other deplorable food from Iowa to New Hampshire. How many of them would step aside in submission because she’s entitled to the nomination? Exactly none, that’s how many. How about Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris and Amy Klobuchar — wouldn’t they defer to her and be proud to let her lead the way again? As for all Hillary-in-waiting voters, is there a movement to draft her? Is there even a letter-writing campaign on her behalf to local newspapers in Iowa and New Hampshire? Surely there’s at least a super PAC out there flush with the cash of all her rich friends. You know, the people who wrote big checks to support the Clintons for decades, only to suddenly conclude after 2016 that there was no longer any reason to donate to the Clinton Foundation.
共0篇回复 每页10篇 页次:1/1
共0篇回复 每页10篇 页次:1/1
我要回复
回复内容
验 证 码
看不清?更换一张
匿名发表 
点评详情
脚注信息
Copyright (C) 2009-2010 All Rights Reserved. 太阳城官网_taobao.com管理系统 版权所有   沪ICP备01234567号
服务时间:周一至周日 08:30 — 20:00  全国订购及服务热线:021-98765432 
联系地址:上海市某某路某大厦20楼B座2008室   邮政编码:210000